The argument was that Darjeeling tea is not a fully oxidized tea, and therefore should not be classified as a black tea. I learned this in my tea course when we tasted the tea from Darjeeling. They dry leaf, more so in the FF, but also present in the SF was a mixed bag of colour - from green to dark brown.
FF Darjeeling |
The rebuttal to the above was: if it's reclassed to oolong, then we're creating instability to the 'system', and starting to confuse what exactly the two classes are.
There was also discussion around why there is a difference in oxidization levels. Darjeeling teas are grown at high altitude, and the FF in particular is a slow growth. The plant has been in a dormant stage for a period of time and it's growth up to the FF plucking is slow. The tea plants in Darjeeling are also a mix of the Chinese variety sinensis sinensis and the Indian variety sinensis assamica. All these factors create a very delicate complex flavour to the tea. In order to capture those subtle nuances in the flavour, the tea is not fully oxidized.
The discussion goes into much more depth, and I encourage anyone with interest to follow the conversations. What do you think? Should Darjeeling black tea be classed into another category? Or should it be in a category all on its own?
From my limited experience, I know that the big differential about black tea is that they are fully oxidized. But the Darjeeling, and perhaps some other teas as mentioned above are not. The tea classes are all about the processing method, and if we are saying that the Darjeeling is not a true black tea because the processing differs, then from what I understand, it can't be an oolong either because there are still differences in the processing methods used.
I've also read the the tea classifications evolved before tea was being processed in the Darjeeling region, so perhaps it is time to add a new class to the standard group and give these groups of high altitude teas a class all their own. Based on the processing method - not the growing regions.
Does anyone have any comments they would like to share??
This is definitely a contentious topic and I've seen some heated discussion about it on Twitter. I'm not sure where I stand so I guess you could call me "on the fence". There are valid points on both sides. The trouble for me that first flush behaves more like an oolong while second flush will often behave more like a black tea. The level of differentiation could get crazy from there as each plantation has their own style and preparation methods. Newfangled "Brandy oolongs" are experiencing a similar identity crisis. All I know is that I love how they all taste :)
ReplyDeleteNicole: I agree, the all taste amazing! I understand about being on the fence, I just don't like to be on the fence myself :). At the end of the day it has to come down to processing and manufacturing methods to determine which category, or if a new category is warranted. I'm all for updating old info with new info, but I also appreciate the ease of having only 6 classes of tea, it could get messy. perhaps a sub class of a class might be warranted. At any rate I'll leave it up to the experts. Thanks for your thoughts!!
Delete